In a significant escalation of military operations, Pakistani security forces have carried out a series of targeted raids near the Afghan border, resulting in the deaths of 23 suspected militants. These operations represent the latest chapter in the increasingly fraught relationship between Pakistan and its neighbors, Afghanistan and India, as the region grapples with persistent security challenges.
The Wednesday Operations
The military actions unfolded on Wednesday in Kurram District, a strategically sensitive area within Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province that borders Afghanistan. Pakistani military officials characterized these as “targeted operations” aimed at individuals they refer to as “khawarij” – a religious term meaning “outsiders” or “rebels” that Pakistani authorities have adopted to describe members of banned militant organizations, most notably the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan, commonly known as the Pakistan Taliban or TTP.

The first raid developed into what military sources described as an “intense” firefight. When the smoke cleared, twelve suspected militants lay dead. Notably, Pakistani military officials reported no casualties among their own forces during this engagement, suggesting either a tactical advantage or a one-sided confrontation.
Following the success of the initial operation, Pakistani forces moved against a second target in what military statements described as the same “general area” of Kurram District. This subsequent raid resulted in eleven additional deaths among the suspected fighters, bringing the day’s total to 23.
A Week of Intensified Military Action
These Wednesday operations did not occur in isolation. They were part of a sustained military campaign that Pakistani forces have conducted throughout the week, with most operations concentrated in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province. By the end of the week, the military had reported more than 30 militants killed across multiple raids, marking one of the most intensive periods of counterterrorism operations in recent months.
The Catalyst: The Islamabad Bombing
The intensified military operations appear to be a direct response to a devastating suicide bombing that struck Pakistan’s capital, Islamabad, on November 11. The attack proved deadly, claiming at least twelve lives and leaving thirty more people wounded. The bombing sent shockwaves through the Pakistani government and prompted immediate calls for retaliation.
In the aftermath of the attack, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif pointed an accusatory finger at India, claiming – without presenting supporting evidence – that New Delhi bore responsibility for orchestrating the bombing. This accusation fit within a broader pattern of Pakistani allegations against its eastern neighbor, though India has consistently denied involvement in such activities.

Pakistan’s Defense Minister, Khawaja Asif, expanded the circle of blame to include Afghanistan as well, suggesting that the attack had connections to elements operating from or supported by Afghan territory. This dual accusation reflected Pakistan’s increasingly embattled position, facing security threats that it attributes to both its eastern and western borders.
The Pakistani government moved quickly to demonstrate progress in the investigation. Last week, authorities announced the arrest of four individuals whom they identified as members of an Afghan cell allegedly involved in planning or executing the Islamabad attack. These arrests provided Islamabad with a tangible way to demonstrate its response to the bombing, though questions about the depth of the suspects’ actual involvement remained.
The Complex Web of Accusations and Denials
Pakistan’s security establishment has maintained a consistent narrative over many years: that militant groups operating on its soil receive backing, training, or sanctuary from both India and Afghanistan. Pakistani officials argue that these external actors use proxy forces to destabilize Pakistan, undermine its government, and sow chaos within its borders.
Both New Delhi and Kabul have firmly rejected these accusations. India has consistently denied providing any support to anti-Pakistan militant groups, characterizing Pakistani allegations as deflection from Islamabad’s own internal security failures. The Indian government maintains that Pakistan’s problems with militancy stem from decades of its own policies of supporting certain militant groups while opposing others.
Afghanistan’s Taliban government, meanwhile, has turned the accusations around, asserting that Pakistan routinely violates Afghan sovereignty through cross-border military strikes. The Taliban authorities in Kabul have documented what they claim are numerous instances of Pakistani military incursions into Afghan territory, including airstrikes and ground operations that they characterize as illegal acts of aggression.
This creates a diplomatic impasse where each side accuses the other of harboring or supporting militants, creating a security dilemma that shows no signs of resolution.
Failed Peace Talks in Istanbul
Recognition of the deteriorating situation prompted diplomatic efforts to de-escalate tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan. Recently, representatives from both nations gathered in Istanbul, Turkey, for peace talks aimed at addressing the security concerns that plague their shared border region.
The talks, however, concluded without achieving any meaningful breakthrough. Negotiators from both sides failed to reach agreements on key issues, including cross-border militant activity, Pakistan’s claims of Afghan-based sanctuaries for the TTP, and Afghanistan’s complaints about Pakistani military violations of its sovereignty.
Despite the lack of concrete progress, both Pakistani and Afghan officials insisted that a ceasefire agreement – albeit fragile and frequently tested – remained in effect. This ceasefire had been established following an earlier eruption of violence between the two countries, when cross-border skirmishes threatened to spiral into more serious military confrontation.
The diplomatic stalemate reflected the deep mistrust between Pakistan and Afghanistan’s Taliban government, as well as the complex interests and grievances that both sides bring to the negotiating table.
The Taliban Connection: From 2021 to Present
Understanding the current security crisis requires examining the dramatic changes that occurred in Afghanistan in 2021. When the United States completed its withdrawal from Afghanistan after two decades of military involvement, the Taliban swiftly seized control of the country, returning to power after being ousted in 2001.
For the Pakistan Taliban – a separate but ideologically aligned organization – the Taliban’s victory in Afghanistan proved enormously inspirational and practically beneficial. The TTP, which explicitly seeks to overthrow the Pakistani government and establish its own interpretation of Islamic rule, found itself emboldened by seeing its Afghan counterparts successfully defeat a superpower and reclaim state authority.
The relationship between the Afghan Taliban and the Pakistan Taliban is complex. While they share ideological foundations and historical connections, the Afghan Taliban government has faced international pressure – particularly from Pakistan – to prevent TTP operations from Afghan soil. However, the effectiveness and sincerity of Afghan Taliban efforts to constrain the TTP remain subjects of intense debate.
Many security analysts believe that the Afghan Taliban has either been unwilling or unable to meaningfully restrict TTP activities, creating a situation where Pakistan’s militant adversaries enjoy greater operational freedom since 2021 than they had when Afghanistan was under U.S.-backed government control.
The Escalating Threat: Record Violence in 2024
The consequences of this security environment have become increasingly apparent through stark statistics. According to analysis from the Pakistan Institute for Conflict and Security Studies, an Islamabad-based research organization specializing in tracking conflict data, the Pakistan Taliban has dramatically escalated its campaign of violence against the Pakistani state.
In August of the current year, militant attacks reached their highest level in more than a decade – a sobering milestone that illustrated the severity of Pakistan’s security challenges. The upward trend has continued, with the TTP demonstrating both increased operational capability and willingness to strike at a broader range of targets across Pakistan.
The year 2024 has proven particularly deadly. By the time researchers compiled their data, the number of recorded security incidents had surged to 856 – a dramatic increase from the 645 incidents documented in 2023. This represents a roughly 33% increase year-over-year, indicating that Pakistan’s security situation is deteriorating rather than improving despite intensive military operations.
These incidents include not only direct attacks on military and police forces but also suicide bombings in urban areas, assassinations of government officials and tribal leaders who oppose the militants, attacks on infrastructure, and kidnappings. The violence affects both the tribal regions near the Afghan border and increasingly extends into settled areas and even major cities like Islamabad.
The Broader Regional Context
The situation along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border cannot be understood in isolation from the broader regional dynamics. Pakistan finds itself navigating complex and often contradictory relationships with multiple actors:
The relationship with India remains defined by mutual suspicion and occasional direct military confrontation, with both nations accusing each other of supporting proxy forces. The long-running Kashmir dispute continues to poison diplomatic relations and create incentives for covert operations.
Relations with Afghanistan have deteriorated significantly since the Taliban takeover, despite Pakistan’s historical role in supporting various Afghan militant groups. Pakistan now finds that the government it once supported has interests that don’t always align with Islamabad’s preferences, particularly regarding the treatment of the TTP.
Meanwhile, Pakistan’s relationship with the United States has grown more distant since the American withdrawal from Afghanistan, reducing Pakistan’s access to security assistance and intelligence cooperation that previously helped combat militant groups.
China, Pakistan’s closest strategic partner, watches these developments with concern, worried that instability in Pakistan could threaten the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor and Chinese investments and personnel in the country.
Looking Forward
The recent raids in Kurram District, while tactically successful by the military’s account, represent only the latest iteration of a conflict that has persisted for decades and shows no signs of resolution. The fundamental questions remain unaddressed:
How can Pakistan effectively counter militant groups that appear to enjoy sanctuary or at least operational freedom in Afghanistan? Can diplomatic engagement with the Taliban government in Kabul produce meaningful cooperation on counterterrorism? What role, if any, do external actors actually play in supporting Pakistan’s militant adversaries? And perhaps most critically, can Pakistan address the underlying grievances and governance failures in its border regions that provide militant groups with local support and recruitment opportunities?
As 2024’s violence statistics demonstrate, the current approach – relying primarily on military operations – has not succeeded in reversing the trajectory of increasing militant attacks. Whether Pakistan can develop a more comprehensive strategy that combines security measures with political, economic, and diplomatic initiatives remains to be seen.
For now, Pakistani forces continue their raids along the Afghan border, achieving tactical victories measured in militant deaths while the broader strategic picture remains as challenging as ever.




